What is "inclusive education"?

In the current moment, I can't give a complete definition of "inclusive education" and I may never be able to. Funny thing is, I am currently finishing a masters in "inclusive elementary education." In addition to studying "inclusive education," I taught for a year in an "inclusive school" in a Washington DC public charter school as well as a semester student teaching in an "inclusive school" in Brooklyn, NY. In both schools, I was in an "inclusive classroom."

I suppose I could start to address my inability to give a complete definition of the term "inclusive education" through the fact that its genesis is Public Law 94-142, the Education of All Handicapped Children Act (1975) and a movement brought about by advocates, scholars, and families who pushed for the rights of students and all people to equal access in education and all other aspects of life experienced by the average person. So, "inclusive education" doesn't have to do with all children...at least not directly. "Inclusive education," "inclusive classrooms," and "inclusive schools" have come to refer to the full placement of students traditionally segregated from the regular classroom or neighborhood school as opposed to a local institution or day school, into classrooms and schools with their same age peers near their home. While there are many ways to continue on this topic and go off onto where the movement is going, my goal is to strictly deal with the term "inclusive education," which I say I can't and may never be able to define.

In DC, my first grade classroom was made up of 14 students, 9 with Individual Education Plans (IEPs - see PL 94-142 for more info) and all of them African American. In Brooklyn, the fourth grade classroom I student taught in was made of 27 students, 13 with IEPs, and all were students of color. Both schools were more than 90 percent students of color. While I realize that both schools were making attempts--albeit significantly flawed--at composing a classroom that included students of all abilities, I could hardly call these classrooms and schools inclusive for reasons beyond the direct association of "inclusion" with PL 94-142 and the disabilities rights movement.

What I witnessed in these schools was the over-classification of students of color as having learning disabilities and emotional disturbance disorders. What I witnessed was exclusion of students of color from schools where "more able" and "less labeled" white students received their public education. What I witnessed was best intentions for all restrained by a lack in having traveled too far down the road away from segregated schools prior to Brown v. Board of Education.

This is not to say that I didn't attempt to create an inclusive feel in both of these classrooms. All students have different abilities and different styles of learning. All students have a unique history and identity that is both dependent on and independent from their race, religion, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, etc.. All students are people and they all require an Individual Education Plan. So, for this reason, "inclusive education" means as a teacher, as a school, and as a larger community, we need to accommodate to each other and include everyone in a way that is fair and equitable.

As a teacher, we must be prepared to include everyone. Currently, in politics, including students with disabilities is a developing and long overdue movement. This means, that currently, we need to be prepared and willing to teach students of a greater variety of needs...but aren't we always needing to be so? For this reason, while I'm aware of the necessity for the term "inclusive education" and the definition it has within the political and educational discourse, to me it means "include 'student name' in the educational experience." Those names are going to keep changing, and thusly, so will my definition of the term.

Average: 4.4 (17 votes)

I think that this is a very

I think that this is a very important topic when it comes to education. "Inclusion" in the classroom is something that affects everyone. All the way from the school, to to the teacher, to the students, to the student who is being included. I think its interesting that there are so many things that affect inclusion. If you take a step back you either think that it is a good idea or bad idea, but when you know deep down what it truly means then you opinion will drastically change. I think that this is a hot topic and will be taken very serious these next few years and it is interesting to follow this topic to see what happens.

Something that really jumped

Something that really jumped out to me about your blog was your comments about African American students being over-classified as learning disabled and having emotional disturbance disorders. I have seen this take place in my high school and I've heard it occurring in other schools. It appears to me to be a very subtle form of racism. Once the students are labeled as learning disabled or emotional disturbed they are often swept under the rug and neglected as viable students. Often times, the students aren't even emotionally disturbed, but are labeled as such so that no one has to take an interest and invest in the child. It really is brilliant how it is done. It takes the focus off of the school and the educational system and puts the blame squarely on the child. However, for all its brilliance, it is incredibly sickening.

Inclusive Classrooms

I believe that inclusive classrooms are decided ultimately by the teacher.  It doesn't matter what is expected of you by your school or you principle, you should include all students.  Lesson plans are easily formatted for different types of learners and as a teacher you should want to include all of your students.  Whatever a student needs, as a teacher you should offer them the opportunity.  There are so many different ways to do so from different levels of intensity, working together, offering different ways of doing activities since all children are different sorts of learners, ect.   

keeping "inclusion" in mind

Indeed Peter, questions are all that could probably follow my post. Of course, that's the Socratic method left out of the educational profession often for the purposes of efficiency. New teachers are tested and evaluated on whether or not they are reflective. Don't you think we should be getting that earlier on? Shouldn't all people be or aren't all people in some way reflective? 

To a certain degree, I do feel that "inclusive" is telling schools/teachers to "include" students and "customize" the classroom, but when someone is told to "customize" and to "include," the accommodating is probably in some way less genuine. Are you including this student because you want them to have a quality education like all other students or because you don't want to get in trouble with your principal. It's an intrinsic/extrinsic motivational issue. 

So, the self-examined will find a definition for "inclusion" if they keep questioning what exactly it is, and if they remain open to questions from others with different knowledge to assist their reflection. But, I heed saying that I know what "inclusion" is, given how different teachers, parents, and others have come to interpret it. I post these thoughts with new teachers in mind. How will we enter the profession? As vessels? cogs? or reflective educators with potential to introduce and evolve the field? We can ask questions to ourselves and ask questions to those who ask of us to try things out. So...yes...just keeping "inclusion" in mind. Keep ya posted. 

Any thoughts/questions from the forum?
 

Interesting post

What you are really arguing for here is "customized" learning for every kid, isn't that right? Whatever their label may be, they have the same right, and the same access to educational resources as everyone else.

And, are you also saying that by making the term "inclusive" a legal and political cudgel by which groups can batter doors open that the system has actually calcified in its responses to kids needing inclusion?

But, you're right that something seems odd when certain rooms and schools, and even majors, are labeled as "inclusive" while others carry no such moniker. Does that mean that the other schools and classes and majors are not inclusive?

Nothing but questions tonight as the rain pounds down. But, maybe I shouldn't feel bad in that you yourself may never be able fully define "inclusive".

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.