If only the good news about Wisconsin education was true
If only the good news about Wisconsin education was true - Roger Frank Bass: Finally, there was some really good news about education. According to the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, the percentage of proficient readers in the third grade had increased from 64.8% in 1998 to 87.4% in 2005. And this improvement was broad-based - every minority group advanced substantially. If only it were true Deception No. 1: Test questions, their scoring and definitions of "proficiency" changed constantly. The number of test items, the kinds of items (multiple choice vs. short answer) and their content varied every year the test was given. The score needed for proficiency dropped more than 40%, from 50 in 1998 to 29 in 2005. That sleight of hand entailed complex statistics to estimate how hard the revised test might be for the next crop of third-graders. That estimate, rather than criteria for effective reading, became the cutoff for proficiency. Obviously, even if mathematics could prove that two tests are equally hard, changing the questions every year meant that subsequent tests weren't assessing the same thing. The tests were apples and oranges, and the mathematics a red herring. Deception No. 2: Reading skills were less important than student guessing, and the test's margin of error. Fifty-three of the test's 58 items were multiple choice with four possible answers. So on average, students guessed 13 answers correctly. In addition, the test's margin of error was six points. Now remember, only 29 correct were needed for "proficiency" in 2005. So with 13 for guessing and six for test error, we have 19 of those 29 (65%). And that's only the beginning. The statistical estimates of proficiency contributed additional error margins that were never added to the students' scores.
Read the whole damn thing.
This whole state-sponsored standardized testing scheme is rife with corruption, idiotic test items, unreliable data, useless assessments, low quality measures of student ability, and flat out manipulation, gaming and corruption.
The stories are starting to come out, but it will be years before we understand the extent of it.
We have to come back to our senses and do what is best for our kids and our schools: return control and resources back to the people that the local community has hired to teach their children.
- Peter Henry's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version

My feelings exactly
Mr. Henry, your statements at the end of this blog echo my own. I am a student in Dr. Gabbards Introduction to Education class at East Carolina University and we spend most of our class discussing readings we've done in the Teacher Education Quarterly, and another book called Out of Our Minds. The thing is, people always try to form statistical information from the results of the standardized tests and I do not see the reason! Standardized tests are developed by companies in business to make money. They are not interested in furthering the educational well being of the children of America. However, we still empower them to create the documents that determine whether or not our university educated teachers in the public schools are fulfilling their job requirements. The test developers at McGraw Hill are not interested in the best possible ways to test the information taught in third grade. Neither are interested in the fate of American public schools. If privatization is the result of NCLB failed, then that would be better for them!!! More money.
I guess my point is that we need to give the reins back to the people educated to teach these children as best the possible can. I agree with what you have said here.