Letters to a new teacher
What Does Climate Change Have To Do With Teaching?
Posted July 1st, 2008 by Peter HenryMerely everything.
Look, if even half of what Dr. James Hansen says is true about global climate change, we are in the midst of the largest educational challenge of all time.
In fact, even just given the explosion of fossil fuel prices this year, and the way we need to adapt to that, one could argue that we are in for one of the largest reorganizations of human society ever.
I see these two events--peak fossil fuel and global climate change--as meaning that, as educators, we are about to embark on the largest educational project of all time. Why? Because what this is really about is becoming much more informed about all facets of sustainability, from what we eat, to what we do, to where we go and how we get there.
read more »- Peter Henry's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Why New Teachers Need A Ton of Help and Support
Posted January 2nd, 2008 by Peter HenrySo, I'm looking over the Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice for Teachers. There are ten standards, many with multiple facets or sub-standards attached, like #2, Student Learning, which reads:
A teacher must understand how students learn and develop and must provide learning opportunities that support a student's intellectual, social and personal development.
Don't panic, I think to myself, by the time you were 10 years into your teaching practice, you were actually reasonably competent in a majority of them.
read more »Pedagogy
Posted November 19th, 2007 by EllenIn my fifth year of teaching I became involved in a local community project. I fought for students at the area high school to receive academic credit for their work in designing, establishing and running the Depot Coffee House. Students did everything from pursuing and authoring grants to digging the structure's foundation. Anyway, I digress, here's my story:
read more »No Child Left Behind
Posted November 7th, 2007 by lbsasserI am a junior at East Carolina University and I'm in the education program. For one of my classes we are currently reading the Teacher Education Quarterly. Throughout the book it continues to discuss NCLB and all the criticism the Bush administration is getting. In my experience with education through observing different elementary classrooms, I have noticed the different abilities of all the kids. There is no way all children will be proficient in reading and math by 2014! It's just not possible because all children are required to take the test and succeed. What about the kids with disabilities? How will they ever pass these standardized test? If there are any other opinions about NCLB, I would love to hear them.
Letter to a new teacher:
Posted November 3rd, 2007 by Peter HenryI'm hearing it a lot these days. It goes like this:
How can I stay or even go into teaching when I am being asked to do things--like prepare children for and administer standardized tests--when I know these activities are not helping them learn, are furthering an agenda that is exploitative and perpetuates a view of education and teaching which is inimical to everything I value and learned about in school?
Good question.
Nay. This is the ultimate question, the answer to which will decide the fate of America's schools for the next decade, maybe even, given the huge conglomeration of economic and military might in this country, eventually, the fate of the earth.
read more »What is "inclusive education"?
Posted September 18th, 2007 by mpinkavaIn the current moment, I can't give a complete definition of "inclusive education" and I may never be able to. Funny thing is, I am currently finishing a masters in "inclusive elementary education." In addition to studying "inclusive education," I taught for a year in an "inclusive school" in a Washington DC public charter school as well as a semester student teaching in an "inclusive school" in Brooklyn, NY.
read more »Letters to a new teacher
Posted September 7th, 2007 by Peter HenryJonathon Kozol has a new book out, Letters to a Young Teacher. Kozol is widely regarded as America's conscience as it relates to educating the least affluent among us. His work includes Savage Inequalities and Shame of the Nation, along with nine other books, and really, by working hands-on in inner-city Boston and New York for more than three decades, Kozol has become a national treasure of truth about the teaching life. At least as it relates to those urban environments.
So, I'm going to quote some of Kozol's thoughts in an article published recently in Education Week. It's more about teachers than his other work, which tends to focus on kids and the system. That makes this highly relevant to our mission at NTN.
And in general, I thought, what a wonderful concept for a group here at NTN.
Veteran teachers racing through, here is my question: What would you write to a young teacher if you had the chance? (And by the way, you do now have your chance!)
Jonathon Kozol:
read more »"The loss of first-year teachers from suburban schools is not particularly high. In inner-city neighborhoods, by contrast, on the basis of my conversations with at least 200 of these young recruits, I would estimate that upwards of one-half decide to leave the school in which they’re placed by the end of their third year....
"The most frequently reiterated reason for discouragement that they express has nothing to do with “relating to their students,” with whom they tend to strike an almost instantaneous rapport. Instead, it has to do with the systematic crushing of their creativity and intellect, the threatened desiccation of their personalities, and the degradation of their sense of self-respect under the weight of heavy-handed, business-modeled systems of Skinnerian instruction, the cultural denuding of curriculum required by the test-prep mania they face, and the sense of being trapped within “a state of siege,” as one teacher puts it, all of which is now exacerbated by that mighty angst machine known as No Child Left Behind.
"The challenge for such teachers, as they convey it to me in our conversations, is: (1) to hold fast to the pedagogic principles they value and the tenderness of their attachment to young people that has brought them to the classroom in the first place, (2) to do so in a way that will not isolate them in their schools and leave them feeling all the more discouraged as a consequence....
"Most of all, I encourage in these teachers a sense of what I like to call “enjoyable and mischievous irreverence” in the course of navigating those mandated miseries introduced by federal pressure into many inner-city schools but, at the same time, a mature sophistication and respectfulness in dealing with their principals, who often view the policies they must enforce with the very same distaste their younger teachers do.
"Inspired teachers of young children, like Francesca, ardently refuse to see themselves as servants of the global corporations or drill sergeants for the state. They disdain to be regarded chiefly as technicians of utilitarian proficiency. And they stalwartly refuse to see their pupils as so many future economic units for a corporate society, into whom they are expected to pump “added value,” as the number-crunchers who determine much of education policy demand.
Few of these technocrats appear to recognize much pre-existing value in the young mentalities of children or, indeed, to be acquainted closely with the personalities and character of children. Rarely, if ever, do they ask if children ought to have some opportunity for happiness during the hours that they spend with us in school. (I cannot find that word in any sentence of the No Child Left Behind Act.)
Faced with these pathogenic pressures, teachers of young children in particular need to learn not only to prevail in the quite literal respect of keeping their jobs and staying in their schools, but also to retain their sense of playful energy and fascination in the unexpected offerings of all those pint-sized packages of whim and curiosity who are entrusted to their care. This is why I fervently encourage them, even in the most decrepit and depressive-looking of our urban schools, to fight with every bit of courage they command to defend the right to celebrate each perishable day and hour in a child’s life, which, in the current climate of opinion, may be one of the greatest challenges they have.
Schools can probably survive quite well without their rubrics charts, their AYPs, and their obsessive lists of numbered categories and containers, reminiscent of the lists severe psychotics make in efforts to control the uncontainable and, for healthy people, wonderful disorder of reality. They can’t survive without excited teachers who take satisfaction in the beautiful vocation they have chosen. Keeping young teachers in our schools is of immense importance, but keeping them there with spirits strong and souls intact is more important still. If we lose this, we lose everything."
